About Innovations

Friday, October 17th, 2008

Initially I started this as a comment for Taneli’s blog entry, but made this as a post after realizing how much I wanted to say about this.

Today in Finland you can hear the word ”innovation” coming from politicians and other officials mouth almost more than “healthcare” and “education”. As much as politicians have something to do with actually curing and educating people they have to do with innovating stuff. The difference is that they know what a school or hospital looks like, but probably they don’t know what an innovation is even it was shoved in their throats.

Politicians seem to think they can get some more of those nice things by educating people more (which actually declines entreprenual probability), throwing more money to people and organizations (well again for most of the time they don’t know what good ideas are) or forcing different kind of people together (Aalto University – okay, it works in theory trough ‘the Medici Effect’).

But what they miss is the actual source of innovations. People. Ideas are almost worthless, resources are usually trivial, but execution is everything.

What makes people execute their ideas? Motivation. Personal motivation can come in different shapes and forms. It can be seek of wealth, personal challenge, achievement, fame, success, can’t let the idea go or all of them. People don’t do great things because of they were educated or have some burning desire to boost the Finnish economy.

Out of those motivational sources, probably the only thing where government can have some influence is ones desire for wealth. If you look at countries that are highly innovative you can probably see that they are also highly rewarding. You can also look back in 1993 when they lowered the capital gains tax rate to 25% here in Finland. In following years this actually led to huge increase of state tax income and lots of professionals jumped to be entrepreneurs. Of course this was not tolerated for long since it’s almost criminal to cumulate more than average wealth in Finland. The only exceptions of cumulating wealth are that if you do it by driving some car, skating on ice or divorcing one of these previously mentioned. Even then you have to actually live in Monaco.

I think that Finns still have some kind of peasant mindset, probably coming from the time we were under foreign influence. We’re a small country with no real friends. We’re afraid to make and dream big things. Even if one would be brave enough of such heresy, others sure are not and you should keep your mouth shut about it as well. One possibility could be also that due of historical and other reasons, we don’t have so many gods living among us – we have very few global brands proportioned to capita.

Innovations are seen complex and almost magical. They are something that some important dudes talk about, doing stuff in their labs and just getting some great ideas while skiing all around Lapland. But what people miss is that anyone can have great ideas, one just needs to execute them.

by Karri Saarinen on Friday, October 17th, 2008.
Read more about me or follow me on twitter.

Go back to homepage

  • Karri Saarinen
    Maija, I belive you're right. We have different kind of financial aids and allowances which TOC probably meant.
  • Welfare programs? Uh, we don't have welfare in Finland.
  • Karri Saarinen
    Thanks for your comment. I agree. Usually politicians are not equipped or it's not their job to solve real problems, so what they can do is throw n+1 or n-1 money to a problem. Unfortunately both can make the situation worse, since more money just escalades or postpones the problem and less money makes life hard to people involved. Real change requires real change in structure, not just in magnitude or resources available.

    The employee’s situation is really good in Finland, both in taxation and in other benefits, but what we actually need is more growing companies. We need to nurture entrepreneurs (and innovation) and not just the employees.

    Currently in Finnish economical decision making there is only three sides, employers, employees and the government. I think that entrepreneurs should be added to the decision making process since most of Finnish companies are small and not clearly represented through employers.
  • TOC
    Hopefully Finland will lower taxes and rethink their welfare programs. I've seen many people who have gamed the system and contribute nothing to the society.
blog comments powered by Disqus